hutch and megg created by rapscallion and third-party edit
Viewing sample resized to 55% of original (view original) Loading...
Parent: post #3346662 (learn more) show »
Children: 1 child (learn more) show »
Show all comments
Blacklisted

    I could just dislike this but instead, let me go ahead and educate you in the science of pornography.

    The Oxford Languages definition of 'Milf' (yes that is a thing that exists), defines a 'milf' or 'mother I'd like to fuck' as a 'sexually attractive, older woman, typically one who has children'.
    Typically meaning, generally but not necessarily, hence the biggest part being the sexually attractive older woman.

    This is also porn, where over 25 is considered 'older' and where 'amateurs' usually make 20 videos per day so, yknow.

    Disregarding all that however, I don't know how any of that would add up to the 'incest' tag being needed, since by definition of this site, incest is referring to 'Any type of sexual act between individuals who are genetically related (family), such as brother and sister, uncle and niece, or father and daughter. This does not include adopted children or people who are only relatives-in-law. For those kind of scenarios, technical_incest applies instead.'.

    Meaning, the person behind her would have to be a direct, blood-related relative like her son, dad or brother, which, while it wouldn't be obvious from this page alone, is also shown to not be true in the children-posts. That is her 32 year old fuckbuddy.

    TL;DR :
    If anything, this would need the 'milf' tag, at least by definition of the people in this pic.
    They are not related, she doesn't need kids to be a milf.

    Yes, this took my several minutes to write, yes, this is a worthwhile use of my time.

    Updated

  • |
  • 25
  • itisi said:
    I could just dislike this but instead, let me go ahead and educate you in the science of pornography.

    The Oxford Languages definition of 'Milf' (yes that is a thing that exists), defines a 'milf' or 'mother I'd like to fuck' as a 'sexually attractive, older woman, typically one who has children'.
    Typically meaning, generally but not necessarily, hence the biggest part being the sexually attractive older woman.

    This is also porn, where over 25 is considered 'older' and where 'amateurs' usually make 20 videos per day so, yknow.

    Disregarding all that however, I don't know how any of that would add up to the 'incest' tag being needed, since by definition of this site, incest is referring to 'Any type of sexual act between individuals who are genetically related (family), such as brother and sister, uncle and niece, or father and daughter. This does not include adopted children or people who are only relatives-in-law. For those kind of scenarios, technical_incest applies instead.'.

    Meaning, the person behind her would have to be a direct, blood-related relative like her son, dad or brother, which, while it wouldn't be obvious from this page alone, is also shown to not be true in the children-posts. That is her 32 year old fuckbuddy.

    TL;DR :
    If anything, this would need the 'milf' tag, at least by definition of the people in this pic.
    They are not related, she doesn't need kids to be a milf.

    Yes, this took my several minutes to write, yes, this is a worthwhile use of my time.

    The more you know

  • |
  • 1
  • itisi said:
    I could just dislike this but instead, let me go ahead and educate you in the science of pornography.

    The Oxford Languages definition of 'Milf' (yes that is a thing that exists), defines a 'milf' or 'mother I'd like to fuck' as a 'sexually attractive, older woman, typically one who has children'.
    Typically meaning, generally but not necessarily, hence the biggest part being the sexually attractive older woman.

    This is also porn, where over 25 is considered 'older' and where 'amateurs' usually make 20 videos per day so, yknow.

    Disregarding all that however, I don't know how any of that would add up to the 'incest' tag being needed, since by definition of this site, incest is referring to 'Any type of sexual act between individuals who are genetically related (family), such as brother and sister, uncle and niece, or father and daughter. This does not include adopted children or people who are only relatives-in-law. For those kind of scenarios, technical_incest applies instead.'.

    Meaning, the person behind her would have to be a direct, blood-related relative like her son, dad or brother, which, while it wouldn't be obvious from this page alone, is also shown to not be true in the children-posts. That is her 32 year old fuckbuddy.

    TL;DR :
    If anything, this would need the 'milf' tag, at least by definition of the people in this pic.
    They are not related, she doesn't need kids to be a milf.

    Yes, this took my several minutes to write, yes, this is a worthwhile use of my time.

    Mother you like to fuck...if they aren't a mom they aren't a milf

  • |
  • 3
  • itisi said:
    I could just dislike this but instead, let me go ahead and educate you in the science of pornography.

    The Oxford Languages definition of 'Milf' (yes that is a thing that exists), defines a 'milf' or 'mother I'd like to fuck' as a 'sexually attractive, older woman, typically one who has children'.
    Typically meaning, generally but not necessarily, hence the biggest part being the sexually attractive older woman.

    This is also porn, where over 25 is considered 'older' and where 'amateurs' usually make 20 videos per day so, yknow.

    Disregarding all that however, I don't know how any of that would add up to the 'incest' tag being needed, since by definition of this site, incest is referring to 'Any type of sexual act between individuals who are genetically related (family), such as brother and sister, uncle and niece, or father and daughter. This does not include adopted children or people who are only relatives-in-law. For those kind of scenarios, technical_incest applies instead.'.

    Meaning, the person behind her would have to be a direct, blood-related relative like her son, dad or brother, which, while it wouldn't be obvious from this page alone, is also shown to not be true in the children-posts. That is her 32 year old fuckbuddy.

    TL;DR :
    If anything, this would need the 'milf' tag, at least by definition of the people in this pic.
    They are not related, she doesn't need kids to be a milf.

    Yes, this took my several minutes to write, yes, this is a worthwhile use of my time.

    Thank you. What a great lecture.

  • |
  • -1
  • itisi said:
    I could just dislike this but instead, let me go ahead and educate you in the science of pornography.

    The Oxford Languages definition of 'Milf' (yes that is a thing that exists), defines a 'milf' or 'mother I'd like to fuck' as a 'sexually attractive, older woman, typically one who has children'.
    Typically meaning, generally but not necessarily, hence the biggest part being the sexually attractive older woman.

    This is also porn, where over 25 is considered 'older' and where 'amateurs' usually make 20 videos per day so, yknow.

    Disregarding all that however, I don't know how any of that would add up to the 'incest' tag being needed, since by definition of this site, incest is referring to 'Any type of sexual act between individuals who are genetically related (family), such as brother and sister, uncle and niece, or father and daughter. This does not include adopted children or people who are only relatives-in-law. For those kind of scenarios, technical_incest applies instead.'.

    Meaning, the person behind her would have to be a direct, blood-related relative like her son, dad or brother, which, while it wouldn't be obvious from this page alone, is also shown to not be true in the children-posts. That is her 32 year old fuckbuddy.

    TL;DR :
    If anything, this would need the 'milf' tag, at least by definition of the people in this pic.
    They are not related, she doesn't need kids to be a milf.

    Yes, this took my several minutes to write, yes, this is a worthwhile use of my time.

    Taking this way too seriously.

  • |
  • 1